Log your accrued CPD hours

APS members get exclusive access to the logging tool to monitor and record accrued CPD hours.

2018 APS Congress

The 2018 APS Congress will be held in Sydney from Thursday 27 to Sunday 30 September 2018


Not a member? Join now

Password reminder

Enter your User ID below and we will send you an email with your password. If you still have trouble logging in please contact us.

Back to

Your password has been emailed to the address we have on file.

Australian Psychology Society This browser is not supported. Please upgrade your browser.

The psychology of climate change denial

Whilst the vast majority of people claim to be concerned about the climate, it is also the case that large numbers of people also avoid, minimise, switch off, or distance themselves from effectively engaging with the problems.

A small but noisy minority actively deny that there even is a problem. How do we understand this, and how do we solve the “It’s Not My Problem” problem?

Key points

  • Across Australia, 87% of surveyed Australians accept that climate change is real and happening and driven in some way by human behaviour.
  • An overwhelming majority of climate scientists (97%) agree that climate change is caused by human behaviour.
  • Despite these large numbers of people accepting that climate change is real and driven by human behaviour, there is a ‘consensus gap’. The consensus gap is the difference between the public's perception of how much agreement there is among scientists that humans are causing global warming (typically about 50%), compared to the actual 97% consensus among scientists publishing in the peer-reviewed literature.
  • One of the ways of dealing with this gap is raise awareness of the scientific consensus on climate change. The importance of this cannot be overstated - research shows that people are more likely to support policy actions to reduce carbon dioxide emissions if they are aware of the overwhelming agreement among experts that we are causing global warming.
  • Robust studies of climate change perceptions in Australia, the UK and America show that only very small numbers of people actually deny that climate change is happening. The figures range from between 5 to 8% of the population. However this small minority can be influential in casting doubt on the science, spreading misinformation and impeding progress on climate policies.
  • Science denial can be stopped by first explaining the psychological research into why and how people deny climate science.
  • The best way to neutralise misinformation is to expose people to a weak form of the misinformation. First, explain the fallacy employed by the myth. Once people understand the techniques used to distort the science, they can reconcile the myth with the fact.

How the APS is involved


Cook, J. (2012). The scientific guide to global warming scepticism. http://www.skepticalscience.com/The-Scientific-Guide-to-Global-Warming-Skepticism.html

Cook, J. & Lewandowsky, S. (2011).The Debunking Handbook. Available at: http://www.skepticalscience.com/Debunking-Handbook-now-freely-available-download.html

Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Skuce, A., Jacobs, P., Painting, R., Honeycutt, R., Green, S. A., Lewandowsky, S., Richardson, M. & Way, R. G. (2014). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature: A re-analysis. Energy Policy, 73, 706-708.

Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., et al., (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature.Environmental Research Letters, 8. 024024 doi:10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024024

Hamilton, C. (2010). Requiem for a species: Why we resist the truth about climate change. Allan and Unwin.

Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Klein, N. (2014).This changes everything. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Lewandowsky, S., Oberauer, K. & Gignac, G. E. (2013). NASA faked the moon landing therefore (climate) science is a hoax: An anatomy of the motivated rejection of science. Psychological Science, 24, 5, 622-633.

Marshall, G. (2014). Don’t even think about it. Why our brains are wired to ignore climate change. London: Bloomsbury.

Skeptical Science http://www.skepticalscience.com/

Stoknes, P. E. (2015). What We Think About When We Try Not To Think About Global Warming: Toward a New Psychology of Climate Action. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.

Washington, H., & Cook, J. (2011). Climate Change Denial: Heads in the Sand. Earthscan, UK

University of Queensland (May 2015). Making sense of climate denial. Free MOOC. https://www.edx.org/course/making-sense-climate-science-denial-uqx-denial101x#.VBxNu-c0phE

The Consensus Project http://www.theconsensusproject.com/

Lewandowsky S, Gilles G and Vaughan S 2012 The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of scienceNature Climate Change,3, 399–404.

Oreskes, N. (2004). Beyond the ivory tower. The scientific consensus on climate change.Science, 306, 1686.

Oreskes, N. (2007). The scientific consensus on climate change: how do we know we’re not wrong? Climate Change: What It Means for Us, Our Children, and Our Grandchildren. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.